{"id":14693,"date":"2014-04-25T13:12:48","date_gmt":"2014-04-25T17:12:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/smarttan.com\/news\/?p=14693"},"modified":"2014-04-25T14:21:03","modified_gmt":"2014-04-25T18:21:03","slug":"dc-notices-that-tan-tax-has-failed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news.smarttan.com\/index.php\/dc-notices-that-tan-tax-has-failed\/","title":{"rendered":"DC Notices That ‘Tan Tax’ Has Failed"},"content":{"rendered":"

The ‘Beltway’ is starting to figure out that a 10 percent tax on UV tanning truly was a job-killing, underperforming tax based on back-room politics and funny math.<\/p>\n

Politico \u2014 perhaps the Capitol’s most-read policy-insider journal \u2014 published a major story Thursday documenting the tax’s failure to come close to revenue projections while closing thousands of tanning businesses and pulling thousands of jobs out of the economy.<\/p>\n

“A 10 percent tax on tanning salons, imposed as part of Obamacare, is not raising nearly as much money as the government predicted,” Politico reported. “So far, it\u2019s generating less than half the $200 million budget forecasters anticipated it would produce annually, according to IRS figures.”<\/p>\n

Actually, it’s more like one-third the forecasted revenue.<\/p>\n

Politico’s story hits as the American Suntanning Association (ASA) has stepped up efforts to call for repealing the 10 percent tax. Team ASA has held more than 50 meetings with key Republican and Democratic policymakers with the IRS’ own data in hand, as well as job loss figures and business closings. Repealing the tax is one of ASA’s major federal policy objectives.<\/p>\n

The 10 percent excise tax on UV tanning was a last-minute addition to the Affordable Care Act in December 2009, “swapped in by Senate Democrats in place of a cosmetic surgery tax \u2014 dubbed the ‘bo-tax’ \u2014 just days before they approved the bill in a rare Christmas Eve vote,” Politico reported, joining the New York Times and The Wall Street Journal as national news groups who have identified the capricious manner the tax came about.<\/p>\n

The story put on record a point ASA has been making in Washington since the association’s formation in 2012: The tax was imposed without any due process of how it would affect anyone nor how much it could reasonably collect to help pay for the Affordable Care Act. The Congressional Budget Office had no clue how this tax would affect the market and no idea how much the government could reasonably expect to collect. In Politico’s story, former Congressional Budget Office Director Rudy Penner called such a projection “a nightmare.”<\/p>\n

The nightmare today for Washington is how the tax has worked out.<\/p>\n