Vitamin D production is one of the benefits that has been associated with human exposure to ultraviolet-B (UVB) emitted in sunlight and by an estimated 90 percent of commercial indoor tanning equipment. While the North American indoor tanning community conducts indoor tanning as a cosmetic service, an undeniable physiological side-effect of this service is that indoor tanning enthusiasts manufacture sufficient levels of vitamin D as a result of indoor tanning sessions.
Indoor tanners have 90 percent higher vitamin D levels as compared to the general population, according to Boston University research.
Because there is mounting evidence that vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in North American society (75 percent of Americans and up to 97 percent of Canadians and more than 1 billion people worldwide are vitamin D deficient at some point in the year), and because society spends more time indoors away from sunlight today than at any point in human history, compromising the body’s natural and intended vitamin D pathway, the vitamin D-related side-effect from cosmetic tanning deserves due consideration.
Breakthrough research in the past two years on the positive effects vitamin D, most naturally, reliably and efficiently derived from sun exposure, has totally changed what can and should be said about ultraviolet light exposure — a development that fully supports the practical and responsible positions promoted by the professional indoor tanning industry for more than a decade. Consider:
In light of overwhelming research linking vitamin D with lower cancer and other disease risks, many vitamin D experts now recommend 1,000 to 4,000 IU of vitamin D daily. But because daily vitamin D intake/production is only a precursor to maintaining adequate vitamin D levels in the bloodstream, the Vitamin D Council, a leading vitamin D advocacy group, now recommends target vitamin D blood levels of 50 nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL) or 125 nanomoles/liter (nm/L).
That’s the key: The higher vitamin D levels now being recommended by vitamin D experts and other public health groups are only naturally consistent with vitamin D levels one would receive by getting regular exposure to UVB in sunlight. As Vitamin D expert Dr. Reinhold Vieth says, “For most vitamins, dietary intakes offer a reasonable reference point for how much people might be need. For Vitamin D, we cannot use dietary intake as a guide, because except for fish, our diets do not provide enough to prevent rickets or osteomalacia. We must take a unique approach to determine a Vitamin D requirement. We need to return to an earlier concept, and think of Vitamin D as ‘the sunshine vitamin.'”