Most in the photobiology community believes that ultraviolet light exposure is somehow related to melanoma skin cancer. But that doesn’t mean that any data have ever connected moderate tanning in a non-burning fashion with melanoma.
That’s the mistake being made by most in the dermatology lobbying community today — a mistake that conveniently benefits those who sell and market the over-use of sunscreen products.
What is commonly missed in discussions about this topic is that nobody has presented data to date to explain exactly how this relationship works or why the relationship is actually inverse when studying indoor workers and outdoor workers. Indoor workers get more melanomas than outdoor workers, which would be impossible if there were a direct relationship between sun exposure and melanoma. What’s more, confounding data on this association are being left out of the discussion.
The photobiology community is in agreement that the main identifiable risk factors for melanoma are as follows: heredity, fair skin, an abnormally high number of moles on one’s body (above 40) and a history of repeated sunburns early in life. These factors, independent of non-burning adult sun exposure habits, appear to place an individual in a higher-risk category for melanoma. What hasn’t been established by data is that indoor tanning has any connection with melanoma skin
cancer:
For more information visit Smart Tan’s consumer web site, www.TanningTruth.com.